Zapier vs Make vs n8n: Which Wins in 2026 (Real Pricing)

Zapier, Make and n8n all connect your apps and run workflows between them. The difference that actually decides your bill isn’t features — it’s that each one counts usage differently. Zapier charges per action step, Make per module run, n8n per whole workflow. The same automation can cost $49, $9 or €20 a month depending only on which meter you’re standing on.

This comparison leads with that arithmetic because nobody else does. Every price below was read off the vendor’s own pricing page on 26 July 2026, and there’s a worked example putting one identical workflow through all three so you can see the spread rather than take our word for it.

Which Automation Tool Should You Choose in 2026?

Choose Make if you want the best price-to-capability ratio and can spend an afternoon learning a visual builder. Choose Zapier if you need a specific niche app connected or want something working within the hour. Choose n8n if your workflows are long, your volume is high, or your data can’t leave your own servers.

If you want the one-sentence version: start on Zapier if you’ve never automated anything, move to Make when the invoice starts to sting, and go to n8n when automation becomes infrastructure rather than a convenience.

How Does Each One Actually Bill You?

This is the section that changes decisions. The three platforms use three different units, and the units are not comparable — which is why comparing $19.99 against $9 against €20 tells you almost nothing useful.

• Zapier task = one action step. A workflow with four actions running once consumes four tasks. The trigger is free.
• Make credit = one module run, and the trigger counts. A trigger plus two actions is three credits per run.
• n8n execution = one entire workflow run. In n8n’s own words: “it doesn’t matter how many steps are in the workflow or how much data it processes — it’s still a single execution.”

So complexity is billed directly on Zapier, mildly on Make, and not at all on n8n. That single property reshapes the ranking as your workflows grow.

The same workflow on all three

Take an ordinary automation: a contact form submission that adds the lead to your CRM and posts a Slack alert. One trigger, two actions. Run it 1,000 times a month.

Five times the price for identical output. And notice Make uses more raw units than Zapier — 3,000 credits versus 2,000 tasks — yet costs a fifth as much, because the included allowance is so much larger.

Now make the workflow longer. Add three enrichment steps. Zapier goes to 5,000 tasks and needs a bigger tier. Make goes to 6,000 credits, still inside the $9 plan. n8n stays at 1,000 executions and doesn’t move at all. That divergence is the entire argument for n8n at scale.

What Does Each Plan Cost?

Full plan tables, read off the vendors’ own pages. All three sell more tiers above these; these are the ones a small business will actually be choosing between.

Two things worth flagging. Zapier’s monthly-billing prices are roughly 50% above the annual rate, which is a bigger annual-commitment penalty than the others. And n8n’s jump from Pro (€50) to Business (€667) is severe enough that most growing businesses will self-host before they pay it.

Is Zapier Still Worth It?

Yes, for two specific situations: when you need an app the others don’t connect to, and when getting something working today matters more than the monthly cost. Zapier’s 8,000+ integrations is roughly double Make’s catalogue, and for long-tail SaaS tools that gap is often decisive.

What you’re buying is time. Zapier’s editor is the most forgiving of the three, the template library is enormous, and a non-technical person can go from nothing to a working two-step automation in about fifteen minutes. Nobody else matches that.

What you’re paying is per-step billing, which punishes exactly the thing that makes automation valuable — adding steps. The free plan makes this concrete: it caps you at two-step workflows, so the moment you want “form → CRM → Slack” you’re on a paid plan. That’s a product decision, not an accident.

Choose Zapier if: you need a specific niche integration · you’re non-technical and want it working now · your workflows are genuinely short · you’d rather pay than learn.

Is Make the Best Value?

For most small businesses, yes. Make’s Core plan at $9/month includes 10,000 credits, which covers around 3,300 runs of a three-module workflow — comfortably more than the average small business generates, at a fifth of what the equivalent Zapier tier costs.

The trade is the interface. Make is a visual canvas where you drag modules and draw connections, which is genuinely more powerful than Zapier’s linear list — real branching, routers, iterators, error handlers — and genuinely more confusing on day one. Expect an afternoon of frustration before it clicks.

Two limitations to know. The free plan enforces a 15-minute minimum interval between runs, so anything needing near-real-time response requires a paid plan. And credit consumption varies by module type: an iterator processing 50 rows is not one credit, which makes forecasting harder than the simple arithmetic above suggests.

Choose Make if: budget matters and you’ll spend an afternoon learning · your workflows need branching or loops · you’re running moderate volume · you can read a flow diagram.

When Is n8n Worth the Extra Effort?

When workflows get long, when volume gets high, or when your data can’t leave infrastructure you control. Those three conditions are also roughly when the other two platforms start getting expensive, which is not a coincidence.

The per-execution billing is the headline advantage. A twenty-step workflow costs the same as a two-step one. If you’re building anything sophisticated — enrichment chains, multi-branch routing, AI steps that loop — that changes the economics completely rather than marginally.

Self-hosting is the other one. n8n’s Community edition is free, open source, and unlimited, and it runs on a VPS costing a few dollars a month. For a business handling health, legal or financial records, that’s not a cost saving — it’s the only one of the three where customer data never touches a third party’s servers.

The cost is real, though, and it isn’t the licence. It’s you. Self-hosting means you run the server, apply the updates, handle the backups, and fix it at 11pm when it breaks. Budget that honestly: a few dollars of hosting plus several hours a month of attention is not free, it’s just differently priced.

Choose n8n if: workflows run to many steps · volume is high · you need data residency · you have someone technical · you want no vendor lock-in.

Which One Handles AI Best?

All three ship AI features on standard paid plans in 2026, and the differences matter less than the billing consequences. Zapier offers configurable agents with company knowledge across its full app catalogue. Make builds AI into the scenario canvas. n8n exposes AI nodes inside ordinary workflows and can be self-hosted with them.

The thing to weigh isn’t capability — it’s that AI steps make step counts unpredictable, because the model decides how much work to do. On per-step billing that variability lands straight on your invoice; on per-execution billing it doesn’t. If you expect to lean on AI features heavily, n8n’s meter is structurally the safer one. We cover this in depth in our guide to AI agents for business.

Which Should You Pick? A Quick Decision Table

How We Compared These Tools

Every price came off the vendor’s own pricing page on 26 July 2026 — not from a secondary roundup, because all three have changed their metering in the last two years and most comparison articles still quote the old units. Integration counts come from each vendor’s own app directory, rounded down.

The cost comparison works by pricing one identical workflow on all three rather than comparing plan headlines, since the plans buy different things. Where a platform’s consumption varies by module type — Make’s iterators, for instance — that’s flagged rather than smoothed over.

What this isn’t: a load test. We haven’t measured throughput, latency under stress or error rates at volume, and don’t claim to. This is a buying guide built on published pricing, documented limits and the arithmetic most roundups skip.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Make really cheaper than Zapier?

For almost every small business, yes — often by 4–5×. Make’s $9 Core plan includes 10,000 credits; the comparable Zapier tier for the same real workload runs $49/month annually. The gap widens as workflows get longer, because Zapier bills each action step.

Can I switch from Zapier to Make or n8n later?

Yes, but you rebuild rather than migrate — there’s no import between platforms. Budget one to two hours per workflow. This is why the per-step billing question is worth settling early rather than after you’ve built twenty Zaps.

Is self-hosted n8n really free?

The software is free and unlimited under the Community edition. The server isn’t — expect a few dollars a month for a VPS — and neither is your time for updates, backups and troubleshooting. Free licence, not free operation.

Which one has the most integrations?

Zapier, with 8,000+, roughly double Make’s 3,000+. n8n has around 1,000 native integrations but can reach any REST API through its HTTP node, so the practical gap is smaller than the numbers suggest if you’re comfortable with API docs.

Do the free plans work for a real business?

No. Zapier’s free tier caps workflows at two steps, which excludes most useful automations. Make’s 1,000 credits and 15-minute minimum interval run out quickly. Both are fine for testing whether automation helps; neither runs operations.

Which is best for AI automation?

All three ship AI features on standard paid plans. n8n has the structural advantage because AI steps make step counts unpredictable, and n8n bills per whole workflow rather than per step — so a model that decides to take twenty steps costs the same as one taking three.

The Bottom Line

Make is the right default for most small businesses: $9 a month buys more usable automation than Zapier’s $49 tier, and the visual builder handles branching that Zapier’s linear model can’t. Pay Zapier’s premium when you need a specific integration or want it working within the hour. Move to n8n when workflows get long enough that per-step billing starts hurting, or when your data can’t leave your servers.

Whichever you pick, price the workflow rather than the plan. Work out how many steps it has, how often it runs, and what that consumes on each meter. That five-minute calculation is worth more than any feature comparison, including this one.

Not sure what to automate first? Our business automation playbook ranks the standard builds by payback, and the beginner’s workflow guide walks through your first one click by click.

Want one practical automation you can set up in 15 minutes, delivered twice a month? Join the free AI automation newsletter.

Sources

• Zapier — Pricing plans
• Make — Pricing plans
• n8n — Pricing plans
• Zapier — Agents product overview
• SBE Council — 2026 Small Business Tech Use Survey

All sources retrieved 26 July 2026. Vendor pricing changes often — the three pricing pages above are the authority, not this article.